|
| |||||
|
TODAY' S COLUMNIST | |||||
|
The possible globalisation of trade
unions Breaking away from such a bleak outlook, an interesting possibility is
being heralded by Amicus in the UK, which has reportedly begun talks this
month with another union in the US and Canada for a possible merger. If
the talks succeed, the result would be a cross-border trade union of over
three million members with the attendant benefits of fresh knowledge,
experience, policies, tactics and methods. This is perhaps the first time
ever that an international merger among trade unions is being attempted.
Amicus is indeed the result of a chain of amalgamations over a decade or
so. It has an international vision, and proudly states that it has created
more European work councils than any other union.
Fearing their decline, many unions around the world have started
reinventing themselves. The Chinese and Russian unions were ridiculed for
long by the American unions as pawns in the hands of managements and the
party. Surprisingly, after over 50 years of meek existence, the All China
Federation of Trade Unions took on Wal-Mart and made the latter recognise
unions and collective bargaining—much against its well-known non-union
preference. The Chinese federation, which lacks experience in grassroots
organisation, is turning to experienced unions in the West for advice.
Will these unions take a cue from Amicus and consider cross-border
amalgamations, advisory services or even offshore unions leveraging their
experience? If they conceive themselves as ‘brands’ with an embedded mass
of knowledge on professional union methods, they may indeed win a market
for themselves.
Many of these international unions have brand appeal and a slew of
policies and methods that are considered mature by workers as well as
employers. If that were to happen, then Marx would be relieved that even
if workers of the world have failed to unite, at least the unions of the
world slowly might. Some believe that international mergers of unions are
the way forward. Doubtless, there are innumerable dangers in this version
of globalisation, and there is no need to list them (union leaders will do
that eminently). But such a potential threat may indeed improve the
quality of Indian unions just as global competition has promoted
efficiency in the business sectors.
Thus far, Indian trade unions have been distinctive in their
politicisation, scant service to members, fragmentation, inter and intra
union rivalry—and despite their decline, would rather run them as fiefdoms
than consolidate and improve internally. If laws were to explicitly permit
cross-border union amalgamations, it would be no surprise if US, UK,
Russian, Chinese, Japanese and German unions line up for suitors. Even if
this would leave our union leaders incensed, the employees may find it
attractive to be part of a better ‘brand’. They may even be prepared to
pay premium membership fees. Many employers may also be happy to have
Japanese-style employer-friendly protests than our noisy gheraos and
dharnas. One should not be surprised if international unions start
offering franchises for local unions and free membership for workers in
emerging markets. Any other ideas? | |||||
|
URL: http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=161040 Print
this Story
Expressindia | The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Screen | Kashmir Live About Us | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | | Labelled with ICRA© 2005: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world. Top | Close this window |